When talking to Paula about my inquiry she pointed out that
I should be aware of issues of discrimination in small scale studies. As I am
working with people with learning disability, and this is a protected
characteristic, meaning it is protected by discrimination laws, this is
something that I need to be very conscious of.
Although I am not obviously going to treat the adults with
learning disability in my study badly, it is important that I am aware of how
my actions are interpreted within my inquiry and within my wider professional
practice. Discrimination can take two forms, direct; where the cause is
obvious, for example not giving someone a job based on their race or religion. Or
indirect where the discrimination isn’t always intentional but puts a certain
group at a disadvantage for example having steps at a main entrance and
expecting wheelchair users to use a back trade entrance.
When Paula brought this issue up with me I was instantly
concerned. The last thing I want is for my inquiry to come across as
discriminatory. I thought about how it might be coming across this way and
decided that as I am trying to look at the benefits of dance for people with learning
then it may seem that I am trying to put this whole group of people together in
one category, which of course could come across as discriminatory.
This is not the case, I am obviously aware that people with
learning disabilities are all individual, as is everyone, what one person likes
another may not regardless of whether they share a learning disability or not. There
is an unfortunate culture within social care and the provision of recreational
services that assume that interest will be common within this group, and often
there is limited opportunity to do much other than arts and crafts, drawing
pictures or making things, while it may be true that many of the people that I
personally work with enjoy this type of activity, it is also true that an equal
number do not, just as in society as a whole.
I in no way wish to suggest through my inquiry that all
people with learning disabilities should be taking part in dance because the
benefits are A, B and C. This is simply not true, for some it will be something
that they never want to do and therefore there would be no benefit to them. But
I do feel that if we are going to provide any service to anyone then it should
be done in the best possible way, and there should be the greatest opportunity
to learn, develop and enjoy. I also know from personal experiences and hearing
of the experiences of those I have interviewed as part of my inquiry that this
is not always possible as teachers are not equipped to teach the wide range of
abilities that may come up against in their current classroom or that there are
a lack of classes provided that are adapted to be able to teach those with
learning disability, is this a form of indirect discrimination, no one is
saying no I wont teach you as you are disabled but they are saying I can teach
you because I don’t know how.
This is something that I would like to be able to address
with my inquiry, by looking at the benefits of dance for my client group I may
be able to see what works best for the majority what benefits are seen, and how
this is being achieved by their teachers, or what isn’t working. By doing this
I don’t hope to find a one size fits all “this is how you teach adults with learning
disabilities” teacher will always need to adapt to the students they have in
front of them, as we are each individual and learn and develop in different
ways but what I do hope to find are some tools, and tips and method that
teachers can have in their armoury. A kind of best practice approach if you
like, tried and tested methods that have been seen to provide benefits and
maximise enjoyment for a large range of people that will allow us to be more
inclusive where appropriate or offer our skills and services more widely.
If anyone has any thoughts on these issues, or perhaps still
thinks that this sounds at all discriminatory or narrow minded I would love to
hear them. I’m finding as in other areas of the BAPP course it is when you are
challenged and start to panic that your thoughts become clearer....
Hi Danni,
ReplyDeleteThe expression that enters my head since reading your Blog is "inclusive".
It is perhaps not the fact of discovering what works for a particular "category" of person, but what works to "include" everyone?
Are you a member of the Foundation of Community dance? www.communitydance.org.uk
They are particularly good at dealing with this matter on a large scale. Perhaps you would be able to discuss the sensitivities surrounding the risk of discrimination within your inquiry?
Perhaps the fact that this has been highlighted to you, could you not use this development within your inquiry (which is pretty much what you have done by blogging, so I apologise if I am stating the obvious!)
I hope this helps Danni!
Best Wishes,
Jo
Hi Jo.
ReplyDeleteYou are not at all stating the obvious, I do want to include this recognition within my inquiry, I'm not sure if that involves changing anything yet, or just looking at things with a different perspective, perhaps it will alter how I interpret and present my results or perhaps the point is just recognising the issue.
The basis of my inquiry was to understand the benefits of dance for people with learning disabilities in order to make the learning experience for them more worthwhile, finding out the best way to achieve this and apply that to an inclusive approach.
I agree the important point here is inclusivity, but in order to be inclusive do we not need to understand the differences between the student we teach in order to meet their needs? But in looking at the differences between groups of students do I run the risk of discriminating?
Thank you for the link, I am not a member, but I will take a look and see if there is any more info to help me think through this issue.
Thanks for your response!